Information on Result #641382
Linear
OA(8
122, 129,
F8, 94) (dual of [129, 7, 95]-
code), using
juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(849, 56, F8, 39) (dual of [56, 7, 40]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(849, 58, F8, 39) (dual of [58, 9, 40]-code), using
- 7 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(856, 65, F8, 46) (dual of [65, 9, 47]-code), using
- the BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 84−1, defining interval I = {5,12,19,…,−5}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(866, 73, F8, 54) (dual of [73, 7, 55]-code), using
- the BCH-code C(I) with length 73 | 83−1, defining interval I = {−9,12,33,…,9}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 55 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.