Information on Result #641398
Linear OA(893, 99, F8, 72) (dual of [99, 6, 73]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(810, 16, F8, 8) (dual of [16, 6, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(810, 17, F8, 8) (dual of [17, 7, 9]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,8P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(810, 17, F8, 8) (dual of [17, 7, 9]-code), using
- linear OA(877, 83, F8, 63) (dual of [83, 6, 64]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(870, 73, F8, 63) (dual of [73, 3, 64]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(867, 73, F8, 55) (dual of [73, 6, 56]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(87, 10, F8, 7) (dual of [10, 3, 8]-code or 10-arc in PG(6,8)), using
- Denniston code D(1,8) [i]
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.