Information on Result #641404
Linear OA(884, 89, F8, 66) (dual of [89, 5, 67]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(82, 7, F8, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- linear OA(877, 82, F8, 63) (dual of [82, 5, 64]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(877, 83, F8, 63) (dual of [83, 6, 64]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(870, 73, F8, 63) (dual of [73, 3, 64]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(867, 73, F8, 55) (dual of [73, 6, 56]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(87, 10, F8, 7) (dual of [10, 3, 8]-code or 10-arc in PG(6,8)), using
- Denniston code D(1,8) [i]
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(877, 83, F8, 63) (dual of [83, 6, 64]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.