Information on Result #641446
Linear OA(872, 76, F8, 60) (dual of [76, 4, 61]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(82, 6, F8, 2) (dual of [6, 4, 3]-code or 6-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- linear OA(866, 70, F8, 57) (dual of [70, 4, 58]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(81, 5, F8, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(81, s, F8, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(861, 65, F8, 55) (dual of [65, 4, 56]-code), using
- projective code from ovoid in PG(3, 8) [i]
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 84−1, defining interval I = [0,27], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−27,−26,…,27}|+1 = 56 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(81, 5, F8, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.