Information on Result #641451
Linear OA(875, 79, F8, 63) (dual of [79, 4, 64]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(83, 7, F8, 3) (dual of [7, 4, 4]-code or 7-arc in PG(2,8) or 7-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- linear OA(868, 72, F8, 59) (dual of [72, 4, 60]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(83, 7, F8, 3) (dual of [7, 4, 4]-code or 7-arc in PG(2,8) or 7-cap in PG(2,8)) (see above)
- linear OA(861, 65, F8, 55) (dual of [65, 4, 56]-code), using
- projective code from ovoid in PG(3, 8) [i]
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 84−1, defining interval I = [0,27], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−27,−26,…,27}|+1 = 56 (BCH-bound) [i]
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.