Information on Result #641466
Linear OA(881, 85, F8, 68) (dual of [85, 4, 69]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(87, 11, F8, 6) (dual of [11, 4, 7]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(87, 14, F8, 6) (dual of [14, 7, 7]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(87, 14, F8, 6) (dual of [14, 7, 7]-code), using
- linear OA(870, 74, F8, 61) (dual of [74, 4, 62]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(85, 9, F8, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(4,8) [i]
- linear OA(861, 65, F8, 55) (dual of [65, 4, 56]-code), using
- projective code from ovoid in PG(3, 8) [i]
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 84−1, defining interval I = [0,27], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−27,−26,…,27}|+1 = 56 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(85, 9, F8, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.