Information on Result #641603
Linear OA(9102, 111, F9, 73) (dual of [111, 9, 74]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(910, 19, F9, 9) (dual of [19, 9, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- linear OA(983, 92, F9, 63) (dual of [92, 9, 64]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(91, 10, F9, 1) (dual of [10, 9, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, s, F9, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(973, 82, F9, 61) (dual of [82, 9, 62]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 82 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,30], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−30,−29,…,30}|+1 = 62 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(91, 10, F9, 1) (dual of [10, 9, 2]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.