Information on Result #641627
Linear OA(988, 96, F9, 68) (dual of [96, 8, 69]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(97, 15, F9, 6) (dual of [15, 8, 7]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
- linear OA(973, 81, F9, 61) (dual of [81, 8, 62]-code), using
- an extension Ce(60) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,60], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 61 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.