Information on Result #641701
Linear OA(938, 44, F9, 29) (dual of [44, 6, 30]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(910, 16, F9, 9) (dual of [16, 6, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- linear OA(922, 28, F9, 19) (dual of [28, 6, 20]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,8P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,8P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.