Information on Result #641715
Linear OA(9120, 126, F9, 96) (dual of [126, 6, 97]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(919, 25, F9, 16) (dual of [25, 6, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(919, 27, F9, 16) (dual of [27, 8, 17]-code), using
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(919, 27, F9, 16) (dual of [27, 8, 17]-code), using
- linear OA(995, 101, F9, 79) (dual of [101, 6, 80]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(988, 91, F9, 80) (dual of [91, 3, 81]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(985, 91, F9, 71) (dual of [91, 6, 72]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(97, 10, F9, 7) (dual of [10, 3, 8]-code or 10-arc in PG(6,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,9) [i]
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.