Information on Result #641733
Linear OA(9111, 116, F9, 90) (dual of [116, 5, 91]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(910, 15, F9, 9) (dual of [15, 5, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- linear OA(996, 101, F9, 80) (dual of [101, 5, 81]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(988, 91, F9, 80) (dual of [91, 3, 81]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(985, 91, F9, 71) (dual of [91, 6, 72]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,9) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,9) [i]
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.