Information on Result #641789

Linear OA(988, 92, F9, 78) (dual of [92, 4, 79]-code), using juxtaposition based on
  1. linear OA(96, 10, F9, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)), using
  2. linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only		Method
1Linear OA(988, 92, F9, 77) (dual of [92, 4, 78]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(988, 92, F9, 76) (dual of [92, 4, 77]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(998, 102, F9, 85) (dual of [102, 4, 86]-code) [i]Juxtaposition
4Linear OA(9100, 104, F9, 86) (dual of [104, 4, 87]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(9101, 105, F9, 87) (dual of [105, 4, 88]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(9102, 106, F9, 88) (dual of [106, 4, 89]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(9103, 107, F9, 89) (dual of [107, 4, 90]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(9104, 108, F9, 90) (dual of [108, 4, 91]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(9115, 119, F9, 99) (dual of [119, 4, 100]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(9116, 120, F9, 100) (dual of [120, 4, 101]-code) [i]
11Linear OOA(988, 46, F9, 2, 78) (dual of [(46, 2), 4, 79]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding