Information on Result #641791

Linear OA(998, 102, F9, 85) (dual of [102, 4, 86]-code), using juxtaposition based on
  1. linear OA(96, 10, F9, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)), using
  2. linear OA(988, 92, F9, 78) (dual of [92, 4, 79]-code), using
    • juxtaposition [i] based on
      1. linear OA(96, 10, F9, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)) (see above)
      2. linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only		Method
1Linear OA(998, 102, F9, 84) (dual of [102, 4, 85]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(9108, 112, F9, 92) (dual of [112, 4, 93]-code) [i]Juxtaposition
3Linear OOA(998, 51, F9, 2, 85) (dual of [(51, 2), 4, 86]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
4Linear OOA(998, 34, F9, 3, 85) (dual of [(34, 3), 4, 86]-NRT-code) [i]