Information on Result #641795
Linear OA(990, 94, F9, 79) (dual of [94, 4, 80]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(98, 12, F9, 7) (dual of [12, 4, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(98, 18, F9, 7) (dual of [18, 10, 8]-code), using
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(98, 18, F9, 7) (dual of [18, 10, 8]-code), using
- linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(990, 94, F9, 78) (dual of [94, 4, 79]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(9102, 106, F9, 87) (dual of [106, 4, 88]-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition | |
| 3 | Linear OA(9103, 107, F9, 88) (dual of [107, 4, 89]-code) | [i] | ||