Information on Result #641812
Linear OA(9109, 113, F9, 94) (dual of [113, 4, 95]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(912, 16, F9, 11) (dual of [16, 4, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- linear OA(993, 97, F9, 82) (dual of [97, 4, 83]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(911, 15, F9, 10) (dual of [15, 4, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(911, 16, F9, 10) (dual of [16, 5, 11]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,5P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16 (see above)
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(911, 16, F9, 10) (dual of [16, 5, 11]-code), using
- linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using
- linear OA(911, 15, F9, 10) (dual of [15, 4, 11]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.