Information on Result #644407
Linear OA(859, 86, F8, 33) (dual of [86, 27, 34]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,30P) ⊂ AG(F,40P) based on
- linear OA(847, 64, F8, 33) (dual of [64, 17, 34]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,30P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OA(837, 64, F8, 23) (dual of [64, 27, 24]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,40P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(812, 22, F8, 9) (dual of [22, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(812, 23, F8, 9) (dual of [23, 11, 10]-code), using
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,13P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,13P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(812, 23, F8, 9) (dual of [23, 11, 10]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.