Information on Result #644450
Linear OA(931, 35, F9, 26) (dual of [35, 4, 27]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,0P) ⊂ AG(F,6P) based on
- linear OA(926, 27, F9, 26) (dual of [27, 1, 27]-code or 27-arc in PG(25,9)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,0P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- linear OA(923, 27, F9, 20) (dual of [27, 4, 21]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,6P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28 (see above)
- linear OA(95, 8, F9, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(95, 9, F9, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(95, 9, F9, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.