Information on Result #644593
Linear OA(959, 85, F9, 36) (dual of [85, 26, 37]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,36P) ⊂ AG(F,42P) based on
- linear OA(953, 73, F9, 36) (dual of [73, 20, 37]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,36P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- linear OA(947, 73, F9, 30) (dual of [73, 26, 31]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,42P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74 (see above)
- linear OA(96, 12, F9, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(96, 16, F9, 5) (dual of [16, 10, 6]-code), using
- 4 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 4 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(96, 16, F9, 5) (dual of [16, 10, 6]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.