Information on Result #644596
Linear OA(959, 87, F9, 35) (dual of [87, 28, 36]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,37P) ⊂ AG(F,44P) based on
- linear OA(952, 73, F9, 35) (dual of [73, 21, 36]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,37P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- linear OA(945, 73, F9, 28) (dual of [73, 28, 29]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,44P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74 (see above)
- linear OA(97, 14, F9, 6) (dual of [14, 7, 7]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.