Information on Result #644648
Linear OA(973, 97, F9, 43) (dual of [97, 24, 44]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,29P) ⊂ AG(F,40P) based on
- linear OA(960, 73, F9, 43) (dual of [73, 13, 44]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,29P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- linear OA(949, 73, F9, 32) (dual of [73, 24, 33]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,40P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74 (see above)
- linear OA(913, 24, F9, 10) (dual of [24, 11, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(913, 28, F9, 10) (dual of [28, 15, 11]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,17P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,17P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(913, 28, F9, 10) (dual of [28, 15, 11]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.