Information on Result #657113

Linear OA(838, 48, F8, 28) (dual of [48, 10, 29]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,8P) ⊂ AG(F,9P) based on
  1. linear OA(837, 45, F8, 28) (dual of [45, 8, 29]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,8P) with degP = 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. linear OA(835, 45, F8, 26) (dual of [45, 10, 27]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) with degP = 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45 (see above)
  3. linear OA(81, 3, F8, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(885, 94, F8, 57) (dual of [94, 9, 58]-code) [i]Repeating Each Code Word
2Linear OOA(2258, 144, F2, 2, 115) (dual of [(144, 2), 30, 116]-NRT-code) [i]Concatenation of Two NRT-Codes
3Linear OOA(2255, 141, F2, 2, 115) (dual of [(141, 2), 27, 116]-NRT-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(2258, 96, F2, 3, 115) (dual of [(96, 3), 30, 116]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(2255, 94, F2, 3, 115) (dual of [(94, 3), 27, 116]-NRT-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(838, 24, F8, 2, 28) (dual of [(24, 2), 10, 29]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding