Information on Result #657133

Linear OA(921, 35, F9, 15) (dual of [35, 14, 16]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,8P) ⊂ AG(F,9P) based on
  1. linear OA(920, 32, F9, 15) (dual of [32, 12, 16]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,8P) with degP = 2 [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using a function field by Sémirat [i]
  2. linear OA(918, 32, F9, 13) (dual of [32, 14, 14]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) with degP = 2 [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32 (see above)
  3. linear OA(91, 3, F9, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(9103, 764, F9, 31) (dual of [764, 661, 32]-code) [i](u, u+v)-Construction
2Linear OA(9100, 764, F9, 30) (dual of [764, 664, 31]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(994, 117, F9, 57) (dual of [117, 23, 58]-code) [i]Construction X with Cyclic Codes
4Linear OA(978, 117, F9, 41) (dual of [117, 39, 42]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(985, 115, F9, 49) (dual of [115, 30, 50]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(992, 115, F9, 57) (dual of [115, 23, 58]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(997, 120, F9, 59) (dual of [120, 23, 60]-code) [i]Construction XX with a Chain of Cyclic Codes
8Linear OA(993, 116, F9, 57) (dual of [116, 23, 58]-code) [i]Construction X with Extended Narrow-Sense BCH Codes
9Linear OA(986, 116, F9, 49) (dual of [116, 30, 50]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(994, 117, F9, 58) (dual of [117, 23, 59]-code) [i]Construction XX with a Chain of Extended Narrow-Sense BCH Codes
11Linear OA(987, 117, F9, 50) (dual of [117, 30, 51]-code) [i]