Information on Result #658314
Linear OA(25643, 262, F256, 41) (dual of [262, 219, 42]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F, Q+71P) ⊂ AG(F, Q+72P) based on
- linear OA(25641, 257, F256, 41) (dual of [257, 216, 42]-code or 257-arc in PG(40,256)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+106P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- linear OA(25638, 257, F256, 38) (dual of [257, 219, 39]-code or 257-arc in PG(37,256)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,109P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257 (see above)
- linear OA(2562, 5, F256, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2562, 256, F256, 2) (dual of [256, 254, 3]-code or 256-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(254,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2562, 256, F256, 2) (dual of [256, 254, 3]-code or 256-arc in PG(1,256)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(4172, 1048, F4, 41) (dual of [1048, 876, 42]-code) | [i] | Trace Code | |
2 | Linear OA(1686, 524, F16, 41) (dual of [524, 438, 42]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | OA(3269, 262, S32, 41) | [i] | Discarding Parts of the Base for OAs | |
4 | Linear OA(25664, 522, F256, 41) (dual of [522, 458, 42]-code) | [i] | (u, u+v)-Construction | |
5 | Linear OA(25665, 524, F256, 41) (dual of [524, 459, 42]-code) | [i] |