Information on Result #658770
Linear OA(855, 68, F8, 41) (dual of [68, 13, 42]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,23P) ⊂ AG(F,25P) based on
- linear OA(853, 64, F8, 41) (dual of [64, 11, 42]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,23P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OA(851, 64, F8, 38) (dual of [64, 13, 39]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,25P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(854, 67, F8, 40) (dual of [67, 13, 41]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | Linear OOA(855, 34, F8, 2, 41) (dual of [(34, 2), 13, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |