Information on Result #658885
Linear OA(874, 82, F8, 55) (dual of [82, 8, 56]-code), using construction XX applied to AG(F,10P) ⊂ AG(F,13P) ⊂ AG(F,20P) based on
- linear OA(861, 64, F8, 55) (dual of [64, 3, 56]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OA(859, 64, F8, 50) (dual of [64, 5, 51]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,13P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(856, 64, F8, 43) (dual of [64, 8, 44]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,20P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(84, 9, F8, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(5,8) [i]
- linear OA(86, 9, F8, 6) (dual of [9, 3, 7]-code or 9-arc in PG(5,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,8) [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.