Information on Result #658912
Linear OA(867, 82, F8, 44) (dual of [82, 15, 45]-code), using construction XX applied to AG(F,18P) ⊂ AG(F,25P) ⊂ AG(F,28P) based on
- linear OA(857, 64, F8, 45) (dual of [64, 7, 46]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,18P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OA(851, 64, F8, 38) (dual of [64, 13, 39]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,25P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(849, 64, F8, 35) (dual of [64, 15, 36]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,28P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(86, 14, F8, 5) (dual of [14, 8, 6]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,8P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.