Information on Result #658934

Linear OA(871, 94, F8, 41) (dual of [94, 23, 42]-code), using construction XX applied to AG(F,23P) ⊂ AG(F,34P) ⊂ AG(F,36P) based on
  1. linear OA(853, 64, F8, 41) (dual of [64, 11, 42]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,23P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
  2. linear OA(843, 64, F8, 29) (dual of [64, 21, 30]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,34P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
  3. linear OA(841, 64, F8, 27) (dual of [64, 23, 28]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,36P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
  4. linear OA(815, 27, F8, 11) (dual of [27, 12, 12]-code), using
  5. linear OA(81, 3, F8, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(871, 47, F8, 2, 41) (dual of [(47, 2), 23, 42]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding