Information on Result #658938

Linear OA(862, 82, F8, 39) (dual of [82, 20, 40]-code), using construction XX applied to AG(F,24P) ⊂ AG(F,32P) ⊂ AG(F,33P) based on
  1. linear OA(852, 64, F8, 39) (dual of [64, 12, 40]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,24P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
  2. linear OA(845, 64, F8, 31) (dual of [64, 19, 32]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,32P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
  3. linear OA(844, 64, F8, 30) (dual of [64, 20, 31]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,33P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
  4. linear OA(89, 17, F8, 7) (dual of [17, 8, 8]-code), using
  5. linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(862, 41, F8, 2, 39) (dual of [(41, 2), 20, 40]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding