Information on Result #658951

Linear OA(866, 92, F8, 37) (dual of [92, 26, 38]-code), using construction XX applied to AG(F,26P) ⊂ AG(F,38P) ⊂ AG(F,39P) based on
  1. linear OA(850, 64, F8, 37) (dual of [64, 14, 38]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,26P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
  2. linear OA(839, 64, F8, 25) (dual of [64, 25, 26]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,38P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
  3. linear OA(838, 64, F8, 24) (dual of [64, 26, 25]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,39P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
  4. linear OA(815, 27, F8, 11) (dual of [27, 12, 12]-code), using
  5. linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(866, 46, F8, 2, 37) (dual of [(46, 2), 26, 38]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding