Information on Result #659118
Linear OA(480, 146, F4, 30) (dual of [146, 66, 31]-code), using trace code based on linear OA(1640, 73, F16, 30) (dual of [73, 33, 31]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,33P) ⊂ AG(F,38P) [i] based on
- linear OA(1636, 64, F16, 30) (dual of [64, 28, 31]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,33P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- linear OA(1631, 64, F16, 25) (dual of [64, 33, 26]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,38P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(164, 9, F16, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(164, 16, F16, 4) (dual of [16, 12, 5]-code or 16-arc in PG(3,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(12,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(164, 16, F16, 4) (dual of [16, 12, 5]-code or 16-arc in PG(3,16)), using
- linear OA(1636, 64, F16, 30) (dual of [64, 28, 31]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,33P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(480, 73, F4, 2, 30) (dual of [(73, 2), 66, 31]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |