Information on Result #659122
Linear OA(482, 142, F4, 32) (dual of [142, 60, 33]-code), using trace code based on linear OA(1641, 71, F16, 32) (dual of [71, 30, 33]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,31P) ⊂ AG(F,35P) [i] based on
- linear OA(1638, 64, F16, 32) (dual of [64, 26, 33]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,31P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- linear OA(1634, 64, F16, 28) (dual of [64, 30, 29]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,35P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(163, 7, F16, 3) (dual of [7, 4, 4]-code or 7-arc in PG(2,16) or 7-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(163, 16, F16, 3) (dual of [16, 13, 4]-code or 16-arc in PG(2,16) or 16-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(13,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(163, 16, F16, 3) (dual of [16, 13, 4]-code or 16-arc in PG(2,16) or 16-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- linear OA(1638, 64, F16, 32) (dual of [64, 26, 33]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,31P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(482, 71, F4, 2, 32) (dual of [(71, 2), 60, 33]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |