Information on Result #661663
Linear OA(9109, 113, F9, 95) (dual of [113, 4, 96]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(927, 31, F9, 23) (dual of [31, 4, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,3P) ⊂ AG(F,6P) [i] based on
- linear OA(925, 27, F9, 23) (dual of [27, 2, 24]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,3P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- linear OA(923, 27, F9, 20) (dual of [27, 4, 21]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,6P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28 (see above)
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,3P) ⊂ AG(F,6P) [i] based on
- linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.