Information on Result #665371
Linear OA(2516, 650, F25, 7) (dual of [650, 634, 8]-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(252, 26, F25, 2) (dual of [26, 24, 3]-code or 26-arc in PG(1,25)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(24,25) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,25) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+10P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- linear OA(253, 26, F25, 3) (dual of [26, 23, 4]-code or 26-arc in PG(2,25) or 26-cap in PG(2,25)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(23,25) [i]
- oval in PG(2, 25) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+6P) with degQ = 4 and degPÂ =Â 3 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- linear OA(257, 26, F25, 7) (dual of [26, 19, 8]-code or 26-arc in PG(6,25)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(19,25) [i]
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 | 252−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−3,−2,…,3}|+1 = 8 (BCH-bound) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,6P) with degPÂ =Â 3 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.