Information on Result #665376
Linear OA(2511, 653, F25, 5) (dual of [653, 642, 6]-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(250, 26, F25, 0) (dual of [26, 26, 1]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(251, 26, F25, 1) (dual of [26, 25, 2]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(252, 26, F25, 2) (dual of [26, 24, 3]-code or 26-arc in PG(1,25)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(24,25) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,25) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+10P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- linear OA(256, 29, F25, 5) (dual of [29, 23, 6]-code), using
- construction for [s, s−6, 6]-code from [s, 3, s−3]-code [i] based on linear OA(2526, 29, F25, 25) (dual of [29, 3, 26]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(2525, 26, F25, 25) (dual of [26, 1, 26]-code or 26-arc in PG(24,25)), using code C1 for u = 2 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(2523, 26, F25, 23) (dual of [26, 3, 24]-code or 26-arc in PG(22,25)), using code C0 for u = 2 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(251, 3, F25, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s (see above)
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- construction for [s, s−6, 6]-code from [s, 3, s−3]-code [i] based on linear OA(2526, 29, F25, 25) (dual of [29, 3, 26]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.