Information on Result #674144
Linear OA(281, 98, F2, 33) (dual of [98, 17, 34]-code), using construction XX applied to C([0,36]) ⊂ C([0,28]) ⊂ C([1,28]) based on
- linear OA(277, 85, F2, 39) (dual of [85, 8, 40]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 28−1, defining interval I = [0,36], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,36}|+1 = 40 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(269, 85, F2, 31) (dual of [85, 16, 32]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 28−1, defining interval I = [0,28], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,28}|+1 = 32 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(268, 85, F2, 28) (dual of [85, 17, 29]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 85 | 28−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(21, 10, F2, 1) (dual of [10, 9, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(22, 3, F2, 2) (dual of [3, 1, 3]-code or 3-arc in PG(1,2)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 3 [i]
- Hamming code H(2,2) [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.