Information on Result #677568

Linear OA(374, 85, F3, 45) (dual of [85, 11, 46]-code), using construction X applied to C([1,99]) ⊂ C([1,87]) based on
  1. linear OA(373, 80, F3, 49) (dual of [80, 7, 50]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3153, 160, F3, 99) (dual of [160, 7, 100]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,99], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 100 [i]
  2. linear OA(369, 80, F3, 43) (dual of [80, 11, 44]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3149, 160, F3, 87) (dual of [160, 11, 88]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,87], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 88 [i]
  3. linear OA(31, 5, F3, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(374, 42, F3, 2, 45) (dual of [(42, 2), 10, 46]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
2Linear OOA(374, 28, F3, 3, 45) (dual of [(28, 3), 10, 46]-NRT-code) [i]