Information on Result #677613

Linear OA(383, 96, F3, 49) (dual of [96, 13, 50]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,99]) ⊂ C([1,87]) ⊂ C([1,81]) based on
  1. linear OA(373, 80, F3, 49) (dual of [80, 7, 50]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3153, 160, F3, 99) (dual of [160, 7, 100]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,99], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 100 [i]
  2. linear OA(369, 80, F3, 43) (dual of [80, 11, 44]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3149, 160, F3, 87) (dual of [160, 11, 88]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,87], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 88 [i]
  3. linear OA(365, 80, F3, 40) (dual of [80, 15, 41]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3145, 160, F3, 81) (dual of [160, 15, 82]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,81], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 82 [i]
  4. linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
  5. linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(383, 96, F3, 48) (dual of [96, 13, 49]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OOA(383, 48, F3, 2, 49) (dual of [(48, 2), 13, 50]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
3Linear OOA(383, 32, F3, 3, 49) (dual of [(32, 3), 13, 50]-NRT-code) [i]