Information on Result #677765
Linear OA(384, 90, F3, 55) (dual of [90, 6, 56]-code), using construction XX applied to Ce(79) ⊂ Ce(52) ⊂ Ce(49) based on
- linear OA(380, 81, F3, 80) (dual of [81, 1, 81]-code or 81-arc in PG(79,3)), using an extension Ce(79) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
- linear OA(376, 81, F3, 53) (dual of [81, 5, 54]-code), using an extension Ce(52) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,52], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 53 [i]
- linear OA(374, 81, F3, 50) (dual of [81, 7, 51]-code), using an extension Ce(49) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
- linear OA(31, 6, F3, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(32, 3, F3, 2) (dual of [3, 1, 3]-code or 3-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 3 [i]
- Reed–Solomon code RS(1,3) [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(384, 45, F3, 2, 55) (dual of [(45, 2), 6, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(384, 30, F3, 3, 55) (dual of [(30, 3), 6, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||