Information on Result #677783

Linear OA(381, 102, F3, 38) (dual of [102, 21, 39]-code), using construction XX applied to Ce(39) ⊂ Ce(25) ⊂ Ce(24) based on
  1. linear OA(365, 81, F3, 40) (dual of [81, 16, 41]-code), using an extension Ce(39) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
  2. linear OA(361, 81, F3, 26) (dual of [81, 20, 27]-code), using an extension Ce(25) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,25], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
  3. linear OA(357, 81, F3, 25) (dual of [81, 24, 26]-code), using an extension Ce(24) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
  4. linear OA(315, 20, F3, 11) (dual of [20, 5, 12]-code), using
  5. linear OA(30, 1, F3, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(381, 51, F3, 2, 38) (dual of [(51, 2), 21, 39]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
2Linear OOA(381, 34, F3, 3, 38) (dual of [(34, 3), 21, 39]-NRT-code) [i]