Information on Result #681912

Linear OA(446, 68, F4, 26) (dual of [68, 22, 27]-code), using construction X applied to C([0,77]) ⊂ C([0,68]) based on
  1. linear OA(444, 63, F4, 26) (dual of [63, 19, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4170, 189, F4, 80) (dual of [189, 19, 81]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,77], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,77}|+1 = 81 (BCH-bound) [i]
  2. linear OA(441, 63, F4, 23) (dual of [63, 22, 24]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4167, 189, F4, 71) (dual of [189, 22, 72]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,68], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,68}|+1 = 72 (BCH-bound) [i]
  3. linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2160, 204, F2, 53) (dual of [204, 44, 54]-code) [i]Concatenation of Two Codes
2Linear OA(2159, 201, F2, 53) (dual of [201, 42, 54]-code) [i]
3Linear OOA(446, 34, F4, 2, 26) (dual of [(34, 2), 22, 27]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding