Information on Result #681984

Linear OA(460, 80, F4, 31) (dual of [80, 20, 32]-code), using construction XX applied to C([0,92]) ⊂ C([0,77]) ⊂ C([1,77]) based on
  1. linear OA(453, 63, F4, 31) (dual of [63, 10, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4179, 189, F4, 95) (dual of [189, 10, 96]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,92], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,92}|+1 = 96 (BCH-bound) [i]
  2. linear OA(444, 63, F4, 26) (dual of [63, 19, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4170, 189, F4, 80) (dual of [189, 19, 81]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,77], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,77}|+1 = 81 (BCH-bound) [i]
  3. linear OA(443, 63, F4, 25) (dual of [63, 20, 26]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4169, 189, F4, 77) (dual of [189, 20, 78]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,77], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 78 [i]
  4. linear OA(46, 16, F4, 4) (dual of [16, 10, 5]-code), using
  5. linear OA(40, 1, F4, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.