Information on Result #684361
Linear OA(526, 35, F5, 17) (dual of [35, 9, 18]-code), using construction X applied to C([1,71]) ⊂ C([1,47]) based on
- linear OA(520, 24, F5, 17) (dual of [24, 4, 18]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(592, 96, F5, 71) (dual of [96, 4, 72]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 58−1, defining interval I = [1,71], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 72 [i]
- linear OA(515, 24, F5, 11) (dual of [24, 9, 12]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(587, 96, F5, 47) (dual of [96, 9, 48]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 58−1, defining interval I = [1,47], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 48 [i]
- linear OA(56, 11, F5, 5) (dual of [11, 5, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(56, 12, F5, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(12,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(56, 12, F5, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.