Information on Result #685891
Linear OA(754, 65, F7, 35) (dual of [65, 11, 36]-code), using construction X applied to C([1,79]) ⊂ C([1,53]) based on
- linear OA(744, 48, F7, 39) (dual of [48, 4, 40]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(792, 96, F7, 79) (dual of [96, 4, 80]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
- linear OA(737, 48, F7, 26) (dual of [48, 11, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(785, 96, F7, 53) (dual of [96, 11, 54]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,53], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
- linear OA(710, 17, F7, 8) (dual of [17, 7, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(710, 20, F7, 8) (dual of [20, 10, 9]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(710, 20, F7, 8) (dual of [20, 10, 9]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.