Information on Result #685900

Linear OA(760, 76, F7, 36) (dual of [76, 16, 37]-code), using construction X applied to C([1,79]) ⊂ C([1,47]) based on
  1. linear OA(744, 48, F7, 39) (dual of [48, 4, 40]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(792, 96, F7, 79) (dual of [96, 4, 80]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
  2. linear OA(732, 48, F7, 23) (dual of [48, 16, 24]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(780, 96, F7, 47) (dual of [96, 16, 48]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,47], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 48 [i]
  3. linear OA(716, 28, F7, 12) (dual of [28, 12, 13]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(760, 38, F7, 2, 36) (dual of [(38, 2), 16, 37]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
2Linear OOA(760, 25, F7, 3, 36) (dual of [(25, 3), 15, 37]-NRT-code) [i]