Information on Result #685906

Linear OA(748, 57, F7, 36) (dual of [57, 9, 37]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,79]) ⊂ C([1,65]) ⊂ C([1,63]) based on
  1. linear OA(744, 48, F7, 39) (dual of [48, 4, 40]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(792, 96, F7, 79) (dual of [96, 4, 80]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
  2. linear OA(740, 48, F7, 32) (dual of [48, 8, 33]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(788, 96, F7, 65) (dual of [96, 8, 66]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,65], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 66 [i]
  3. linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
  4. linear OA(73, 8, F7, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,7) or 8-cap in PG(2,7)), using
  5. linear OA(70, 1, F7, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(748, 57, F7, 35) (dual of [57, 9, 36]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OOA(748, 19, F7, 3, 36) (dual of [(19, 3), 9, 37]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding