Information on Result #685916
Linear OA(744, 60, F7, 28) (dual of [60, 16, 29]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,63]) ⊂ C([1,49]) ⊂ C([1,47]) based on
- linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
- linear OA(733, 48, F7, 24) (dual of [48, 15, 25]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(781, 96, F7, 49) (dual of [96, 15, 50]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
- linear OA(732, 48, F7, 23) (dual of [48, 16, 24]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(780, 96, F7, 47) (dual of [96, 16, 48]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,47], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 48 [i]
- linear OA(74, 11, F7, 3) (dual of [11, 7, 4]-code or 11-cap in PG(3,7)), using
- linear OA(70, 1, F7, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(744, 30, F7, 2, 28) (dual of [(30, 2), 16, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(744, 20, F7, 3, 28) (dual of [(20, 3), 16, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||