Information on Result #685922
Linear OA(751, 62, F7, 34) (dual of [62, 11, 35]-code), using construction XX applied to C([0,67]) ⊂ C([1,63]) ⊂ C([1,53]) based on
- linear OA(743, 48, F7, 34) (dual of [48, 5, 35]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(791, 96, F7, 69) (dual of [96, 5, 70]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [0,67], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,…,67}|+1 = 70 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
- linear OA(737, 48, F7, 26) (dual of [48, 11, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(785, 96, F7, 53) (dual of [96, 11, 54]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,53], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
- linear OA(72, 8, F7, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(6,7) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,7) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+1P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F7 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 8, using the rational function field F7(x) [i]
- linear OA(74, 6, F7, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,7)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(74, 7, F7, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,7)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(74, 7, F7, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,7)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.