Information on Result #690787
Linear OA(963, 87, F9, 43) (dual of [87, 24, 44]-code), using construction X applied to C([0,85]) ⊂ C([0,79]) based on
- linear OA(961, 80, F9, 43) (dual of [80, 19, 44]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9141, 160, F9, 87) (dual of [160, 19, 88]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,85], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,…,85}|+1 = 88 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(956, 80, F9, 40) (dual of [80, 24, 41]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9136, 160, F9, 81) (dual of [160, 24, 82]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,79], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,…,79}|+1 = 82 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(92, 7, F9, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.