Information on Result #690848
Linear OA(961, 86, F9, 42) (dual of [86, 25, 43]-code), using construction X applied to C([0,83]) ⊂ C([1,79]) based on
- linear OA(959, 80, F9, 42) (dual of [80, 21, 43]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9139, 160, F9, 85) (dual of [160, 21, 86]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,83], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−1,0,…,83}|+1 = 86 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(955, 80, F9, 39) (dual of [80, 25, 40]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9135, 160, F9, 79) (dual of [160, 25, 80]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
- linear OA(92, 6, F9, 2) (dual of [6, 4, 3]-code or 6-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(961, 86, F9, 41) (dual of [86, 25, 42]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(961, 43, F9, 2, 42) (dual of [(43, 2), 25, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |