Information on Result #691070
Linear OA(970, 105, F9, 39) (dual of [105, 35, 40]-code), using construction XX applied to C([0,20]) ⊂ C([0,14]) ⊂ C([0,13]) based on
- linear OA(957, 82, F9, 41) (dual of [82, 25, 42]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 82 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−20,−19,…,20}|+1 = 42 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(949, 82, F9, 29) (dual of [82, 33, 30]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 82 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−14,−13,…,14}|+1 = 30 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(945, 82, F9, 27) (dual of [82, 37, 28]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 82 | 94−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−13,−12,…,13}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- linear OA(91, 3, F9, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, 9, F9, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.